Turtle Beach X1 Hdmi And Receiver

of weapons Gaddafi civil destruction of the culture

What just happened on the outside, from the events unleashed with Tunisia, has to be sobering. If you do not learn from this, I mean, if we fail to see the farce that moves at the bottom of the "international arena", it is because we're screwed, screwed to the fontanel roundly .

all begins in northern Africa. Kicks off in Tunisia with a rebellion. It is spread Egypt and Mubarak falls, the man who, in Kissinger's words, was the "best way to achieve U.S. objectives in the region." Back in Asia, the Middle East called (because the waves sink and spreads, and this world seems a network of communicating vessels), the Jordanian king enculilla and change his cabinet, just in case they knocked him to it too.

rebellious The trail stretches across the Muslim world, either African or Asian, Arab culture where it seems the common denominator factor: Algeria, Bahrain, Iran, Libya, etc. As if we could say that it stands a village, a culture, in a voice of protest against the domain factors, of course, does not seek nor prosperity and happiness.

But the issue has transcended borders and has become a fact, called by many "Tunisia." Everywhere there have been attempts to reproduce a "egiptazo", or at least has served for many citizens the world protest the failure of their leaders, either spontaneously or tampered with. Even in China there was an outbreak, ipso facto suffocated. Well, well!

Without going too far near here, in the U.S., in Wisconsin, people settled in one place and began to protest to the governor, who, like all capitalist whoring labor rights of thousands of workers around rich people. : And here, ladies and gentlemen, in Venezuela, a white bottom boys, called Javu, almost made an attempt to starve until the "tyrant to leave" as is the slogan of dreams easy opponents. , The first by social demands, and the latter, as mandated by external agents.

"Does not the story sounds like the charade of weapons of mass destruction Massive Iraq to steal its oil? "

The issue to consider is that in the overwhelming majority of countries ─ protests in the area beyond the intricacies originating ─ rulers are allies of the U.S., which leads us to conclude, first, that the waters are neoliberalism and capitalism in the global context, with its exclusionary policy of starvation, moving you to the floor of the U.S. puppet rulers spread across the planet.

The second point is Iran and Libya, all countries aligned with U.S. political or ideological affections: As soon began protests in Egypt, the U.S. and its allies began to preach factors that the same should be done in these countries against their leaders (think Mrs. Clinton warming the ear of the Iranian opposition). Well, well, as if to say: Hell, if they sink my allies in the region, screw the rest! Boy Meets World, the world and me ... or vice versa.

Reflection, the landscape where we have to look in depth is this: Most of these countries, and protests are prolonged, and even repression, but the system of global media looked the other way. But just started Libya ─ rolls in oil country, not just pro-US ─, presented the UN and NATO with its resolutions and threats. The imperial system means ─ ─ bombed Gaddafi said the army civil aviation, and so without proof and perhaps even without facts, and on that basis the decision to intervene, attack and, most likely, invade soon.

At this point many would put into question the alleged bombing ... but because the UN decision is taken and the U.S. military put their positions. In the case de facto, not matter whether it was true or false type (informative or uninformative).

And finally, the inevitable question: Are we not the story sounds like the charade of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to steal their oil?

should already be clear that the UN global institution ─ ─ actually defends sector and ideology in the world and nothing else. I say and I feel silly with this finding warm water, as they say, but as reflections which is annihilated, and intelligent idiots together: Israel has years trancazos giving the Palestinians and the UN is still there, "Well, thank you, silent, alive and kicking as slang. And Israel's a serious matter because it is an attacking another state, licensing causal interventions from the perspective of international political penalty. But you see: & # 160; Libya, which did not attack the other, which presents a problem "internal", it will be soon, as the winds blow.

How long imperial double standards, dammit?

Blogalaxia: UN, global imperialism , Libya

Technorati: UN, global imperialism , Libya