Tindaya What looks set to become the case that has generated more literature in the history of the Canary Islands. Journalists, the regime or not, politicians, construgobernantes or not, now joins the debate within the engineers.
architect Lorenzo Fernández-Ordóñez , presented at the School of Engineering, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria some arguments that challenge the idea dystopian (not utopian) consisting emptied of its interior .
As the land surplus to debris generated by the emptying of the mountain, the architect said, " all this material will be used to reconstruct the landscape of abandoned gravel quarries" . The man, despite his good intentions, it is ready, pierce the mountain offers, if it works or not. If it works, great, robbery is done. If not, and breaks down the mountain as we now do with it removed. A master plan!
Fernández-Ordóñez, insisted: "We must act to know the real behavior of the mountain " and explained that only direct intervention in the Stone "really tell us whether Mountain will hold the casting for the project as close as possible to the idea of \u200b\u200bEduardo Chillida .
During the conference reinforced the possibility that the mountain will not withstand the drain, which would have to give up its construction for fear of a collapse in spite of complex anchoring systems.
It remains to be seen whether emptying the pockets of taxpayers also will be a collapse, but economy. The data show that in Fuerteventura its 100,000 inhabitants, support a debit of 578 euros per capita for the heavy debt municipalities with their financial institutions. And what Tindaya now in the few tens of millions of euros in losses .
But the Canary Coalition puppeteers as always, encouraging the disparate treat the construgobernantes .