Saturday, February 26, 2011

2010 Sep Contribution Calculator

Demand mobbing in Water Supplies of La Oliva [1]

We had time announcing the disaster and the arbitrariness with which it acted in municipal ownership society Water Supply and La Oliva over time has given us reason to all sorts of details.

As follows from the claim for breach of Fundamental Rights, presented as a plaintiff D. Javier Jorge Miguel Estrada Laza, and respondent Water Supplies of La Oliva (hereinafter SALO), in the wake of a series of events that occurred during his tenure at the company and the ongoing confrontation with the mayor recently held Rosa Fernandez with the council member of the board of SALO, Domingo González Arroyo.

As of 15/05/1989 SALO entity agrees to the recruitment of the actor as Technical Director Water Treatment Plant, with a salary of 15 pay the amount of 250,000 pts, salary increases, and we must add many rewards during the tenure of Domingo Gonzalez Arroyo. gross daily wage with bonuses proportion the act, according to payrolls during the year 2009 to January 2010 is 488.60 euros gross per day, (representing approximately € 14,648 per month that has been paying the current mayor, despite having denounced when it was in opposition).

According certification of Fuerteventura Register dated 09/09/2008, the respondent has not submitted annual accounts or memory since 2006.

By letter dated July 14, 2009, date 07.21.2009 Departure Record and later 03/02/2010, the defendant required the plaintiff Academic Degrees and Employment Contracts , appointments .

By agreement of the Governing Council, agreed regulate wages and professional actor, given that since 2008 had revoked the powers of attorney granted in due course.

At a meeting in the workplace to attended by workers, Ms Rosa Fernández Rodríguez and D. Domingo Gonzalez Arroyo, which distributed a lot Christmas to all workers, Ms. Rosa said the actor because they are not already distributed, answering the actor who "lacked a" Mrs Rosa answering the deal because there was always none, that if one was that of actor, because earned enough money to buy it from his pocket. The actor is in a position of IT since 01/04/2010, with a diagnosis of stress.


Therefore, the actor believes that he is subject to harassment in the workplace.

In the second installment will relate the legal reasoning of the Judgement of the Labour Court No. 2 and eventually will reveal whether estimated or rejecting the demand.

0 comments:

Post a Comment