Friday, July 16, 2010

Diagnostic Plug Location Alhambra

Hugo Chavez in Colombia, between gods and designs

Magnicidio1 know In ancient clairvoyance. Among the Greeks, when a warrior died in the hands of another, used to predict death. , is famous Case Hector Achilles, in predicting his death from the arrows of Paris. Much later, years after the end of the Trojan War, Odysseus dies in the most simple, as a king on his island and nothing like a war was threatening. The oracle had predicted that death would come from the sea and, in effect, killed him a hedgehog.

Surely, if we want to be effective soothsayers, ruling that we all die. It's for sure. The problem is always to know when or how, unless you do an incurable disease that a doctor that we have so many months, for example. Edgar Cayce, visionary American told him one day to an actress who does not ride on the plane, it seems more important than what's expected at your destination. Do not obeyed, and his chapter is history. (By the way This psychic predicted the demise of the U.S. under floods, after which embody an era of dominance in South America)

live, finally, the uncertainty of life, which is to say death, not knowing when we get to travel so long. We have close at hand to kill someone for us to "confess" the future, as between Greeks, nor the fate of a sighted friend as Cayce has a vision and warn us. None of oracles for these times.

This brings us to "trust" to live like everyone else, under uncertainty, which by dint of being normal as the assumed invulnerability, thinking ourselves not ever that we come to look bald. Can you imagine ? Thoughts of death at every turn? Terrible, no doubt, and would like to be in life were to die permanently, given the anguish and fears.

Gone are those mythical times, forecasting future, apparently. He did not move a Greek or a Trojan soldier into battle (to follow the reference) if an eagle was a "bad fly in the sky, or if the viscera of a slaughtered bird showed something sinister. Were it not for the octopus Paul's recent World Cup, which matched all the results predicted, there seems reliable sources in this prediction, as corresponds to a time when scientific and chopper so that myth that Vivimi. The distrust of everything, even those poets who advise you, come to rely on ourselves, almost exclusively as it corresponds to a modern and postmodern advocates reason as the personal gift, divine and even contradivino. There are no gods.

And so the story we are left to us than ourselves, that is, reason, logic, the help of science, and social policy. As our philosopher said Guillent JR Perez, speaking of the Greeks, of course, and the message of his philosophy: man must be free, is to live without God. "

So we have the analysis to try to predict the future, considering the cold facts, through the deployment of a mental act quite contrary to the theory involved in any surrealist or chaotic, which observes the suppression of reason. more so if we want to foresee is our own safety.

"It exaggerates the effect of a single visit in order of probability of death awaited"

President Hugo Chavez has been invited to attend the inauguration of new president of Colombia, Juan Manuel Santos; and apparently, as projected to the media, the chief executive is torn between going or not. No doubt a bold move, no more thinking, much more into his hesitation.

logic and reason, which is what we have, as we said, shouting temperance, coldness into consideration. The logic, for example, calls for respect in the approach its premises. We will not say that Colombia, as is the nineteenth-century rulers set up their caste, is a piece of lost continental country, not sinking into a foam pessimistic, but we must not be forgotten that we have never belonged soul, really , even during the time of Bolívar, Santander also times when it started to gel as a counter-government system, traitor and stateless.

With all his love of integration, we wanted to call Bolivar "Colombia", but made a living at it, at the very heart of Colombia and hopelessly Santanderists and delivered to the design of a new imperialist foreign power, instead of the old English evicted. almost like a mockery of life, deep historical symbolism, Bolívar died on their land, where they flourished everything against which he fought living: oppression social, colonial oppression, exploitation of man by man, social caste differentiation terrible ... and where the sun of today continues that very leafy garden. Colombia is now home to the counter, seat of the anti-Bolivarian, imperial protectorate U.S., base of 7 foreign military garrisons, wedge against Latin American integration, contranacional devastating spirit and ideals. Hugo Chávez, meanwhile, embodies the contrary, a Bolivarian spirit of those killed in the body of Bolivar in his time ... How can one claim to fit into the center of the moral antonyms? Protests are heard from the premises and logic.

should be here today and for a long period of time, according to the enclave that has practiced the rule of the USA on their land (military bases, funding), Colombia is a country that lost the case, almost no enemy be by ordinary people, like the Venezuelan, Ecuadorian or Peruvian, always in need of independence. To believe otherwise, rooted in a noble desire not to recognize realities, is losing the only defenses that provides a modern living, with the Greek without gods, as we said, given only to our own and rational designs. No better place to kill a president or ideal as Hugo Chavez Colombia. Colombia today is the result of a historical process, nothing erasable in its results in two or three years, less by way of good wishes illusion or mentalism, much less for a single visit.

From the point of view of reason, the considerations. She is a capacity for consciousness. Hugo Chávez are required to have it and to abide by it. The same President has said what the country would be killed if he died. Needless to mention the consequences. Bástese leave asserted that it will be decades for a socialist transformation promise to turn back in our land, that same future will be severely constrained by the political right, more diligent, more astute, more unscrupulous, mindful of the Chávez unwanted and historical experience. Today the opposition

assassin and internationally who will light candles in the revolutions black pray that Hugo Chavez loses its lining: an orphan decision of approval of the only gods Personal modern times: reason and logic. Have not you seen the buzz in the political opposition, which almost pushed and sentence "What a coward!" for the president to embark on a bad time to Colombia? One of his favorite prayers is the effect to pick up the assertion that Hugo Chavez does not get anything to mend relations with the neighboring country. ... Please! Fixing the issue with Colombia Chavez when 7 U.S. military base are exercised and one of his favorite soldiers (Juan Manuel Santos) exercises the power! It exaggerates the effect of a single visit In the interests of long-awaited chance of death.

Blogalaxia: assassination, Hugo-Chavez, Juan Manuel Santos
Technorati: assassination, Hugo-Chavez, Juan Manuel Santos

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Best Packaged Air Conditioners

The inevitable.

Guerra EEUU-Irán to know when I'm not the first shot ring, or from where. A war breaks out or suddenly or after a long challenge, to escaping a first shot. & # 160; U.S. and Israel to walk their boats in international waters in the Middle East tempting a provocative act, beyond the waiting period raised by the letter of UN sanctions, given that you can import a damn, as demonstrated when the attack on Iraq. The police of world went into international waters adjacent to the Gulf to bring luck, to run with the temptation to inspect an Iranian ship, which would correlate their respective Asian country on ships in the Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, as warned a Navy commander. Immediately could start coming and going of projectiles, as Fidel Castro warns one of his writings. A shower of war.

Predicting

wars is as simple as it is. Just to know what the objections to power and who has something that needs to continue exercising power. Take off no more from the account of the fact that wars are just out of pride, and even symbolic images, the more so and predetermination, if necessary. You remember as a child and the most handsome of the guys he painted his mother on the floor and Then I undertook to spit or lewd hip movements on "her." They started a fight, a war, because, although a grandparent from a window fall warned that it was stupid to pineapples because of some lines drawn on the ground.

Or think of the bombing which was applied to Libya after Muammar Khadafi called "mad dog" to Ronald Reagan, then president of the United States. Of course, we will not say that it was because of the insult in question that decided the bombing, but all that is that if we consider that the war against terrorism that began in those years was the pantomime that is known now (a vulgar excuse)! Check them coconut, in that order of ideas, shuffling to the present-day Venezuela, charged with three imperial historical arguments of the war: communism, terrorism and drug trafficking!

War raised in the Middle East has a look of need for the U.S. dominance in the world. Let him clear. It has nothing to do with pride, African dogs or gringos, images or symbols, or in any way due to the much ballyhooed clash of civilizations, which makes us think of a bunch of gringos (and French Sarkozi in particular) going to those places to ban hand amputation for thieves and the use of the burka in women. Nothing further. When the U.S. was positioned in the lands of the Middle East and Persian Gulf waters, in full Cold War, back in 1957 under a doctrine called Eisenhower and Carter then, do so before for oil and mineral resources to contain the Soviet Union.

The Middle East was formed by "rogue" states and was a territory disputed in the Soviet influence, but also contained and contains the "80% or more of the world reserves of oil and natural gas and uranium reserves , copper, cobalt and other key industrial materials. "¹ So his theater of war ─ ─ today is a result of a conscious U.S. profiling in its capacity as end-dependent industrial apparatus energy and is a consequence of military geo-strategic calculations.

is clear that the U.S. and company fired the last round of war and plunder before turning "concerned" to Latin America. Of things not be successful there, soon we will have them at home. Tell

therefore as simple as possible, that the U.S. is the play as an industrial power and military adventure in the Middle East and Persian Gulf waters, although it sounds spectacular. GREATLY today when projected oil reserves depleted in planet and when another competitor emerges voracious giant in the international arena (China). Look at it this way: the U.S. is one of the major oil producers in the world, but are not themselves sufficient for self-sufficient its necessity, have to import. They consume 20 million barrels per day (produces 5), and is estimated at 2,025, along with China, will consume 35% of global reserves. See

northern concern [...] In 1970 the U.S. produced its own crop of more than 10 million barrels a day, now barely reaches 5. They have retained the order of 16 billion and annually consume 7,300 million, ie approximately two years of support. Daily swallowed 19 million barrels and, as I said, produces 5! ²

They knew since middle of last century and before when unusually developed its industrial unit, took geostrategic forecasts, now have to recover the investment. Who dares, ergo to bet that there will be no war? already maintain presence in Iraq and ensure a high percentage of regional conquest, though it is argued that the war was a fiasco, as the country is a mess and there is no optimal security hydrocarbon extraction. But such is the plan! There ─ ─ principle a pacified country taken by the U.S. (Japan, perhaps, a high price), since the doctrine of non-domain is precisely the state of peace but incendiary capsize. It permanently authorizes the imperial intervention and weakness remains the object of the subject. That is, the Machiavellian doctrine in situ and in vivo. Once

made clear the greed and extreme-energy dependence of the U.S., another factor to consider is Zionism that has been pivotal in positioning the apparatus of political and economic power country, to the extent that employees of the CIA, to discuss a significant expression level, complain that they have become an appendage of the Mossad operation. ³ Further, even when you take a look at the U.S. governmental structures, you will notice that the bodies are taken over by personalities and officials who do not seem to hesitate to consider Israel as a sort of "historical homeland", to whose altar is opaque because the oath of allegiance to the U.S.. , Rahm Emanuel (boss in the White House), Hillary Clinton (Secretary of State), Joseph Baiden (Vice Chair), Robert Gates (Defense Minister), Timothy Geithner (Minister Finance) Bill Richardson (Commerce Minister), Tom Dashle (Health Minister), among others, are oxen that tip the balance toward a region imperialized by the State of Israel, that's like saying the United States.

To end and to bring nearer the drama of the Middle East for us, pull you to Latin America, and correlate the situation in the natural resources aspect of the geopolitical and geostrategic. As above, where Middle East was recorded as an asset geostrategic, here there is a record of "backyard", appearing Venezuela and Brazil as strong in natural resource stocks, geopolitical and geostrategic, and Colombia and Chile as the imperial art of the boot on the continent. It is clear that the U.S. and company fired the last round of war and plunder before turning "concerned" to Latin America. Of things not be successful there, soon we will have them at home.

Notes:
1. Michael T. Klare, "The New Geopolitics of Energy" [online]. In Colombia Indymedia . - May 11, 2008. - [Screen 8]. - http://colombia.indymedia.org/news/2008/05/86487.php . - [See: 14 Jul. 2010].
2. Oscar J. Camero: Brief oil portrait of U.S. imperial system "[online]. In Political Animal. - 23 Oct. 2009. - [Screen 9]. - http://zoopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/10/breve-retrato-petrolero-del-sistema.html . - [See: 14 Jul. 2010].
3. Nil Nikándrov: "The Bilderberg conspiracy in Latin America" \u200b\u200b[online]. In Strategic Culture Fund. - 3 Jun. 2010]. - [Screen 5]. - http://es.fondsk.ru/article.php?id=3070 . - [See: 14 Jun. 2010].

Technorati: oil War, Middle East, Iran-US
Blogalaxia: , Middle East, Iran-US